The Republican primaries are a foot
and Donald Trump is leading the polls to become the Republican nominee to
challenge Hillary Clinton for the Presidency of the United States of
America. Although Trump never served in
the military, he has a deep profound respect for them that was garnered when he
was sent to military school as a child.
As of now, it is time for the Iowa Caucus, which is said to be one of
the more important caucuses during the primary season. It is here that Donald Trump decides to hold
a fund raiser for veterans. The event
raises $2.8 Million dollars and the Trump foundation paid all the
administrative fees out of pocket to ensure that the full amount went to the
Veteran charities.
Part of the costs burdened by
the Trump foundation went to people also on his campaign staff to help manage
the fund to transport the money to the various charities. Although they did work for the campaign, none
of the money raised went toward the Trump campaign or aided financially in his
vying to become the next president of the United States. Only liberals could take this innocuous,
objectively good deed, and spin it to punish him three years down the
road.
It is now January 2017 and
Donald Trump is now President Trump.
This unleashes a variety of backlash as liberals across the country
mourn. One such person is attorney Mark
Zaid as he tweets out “The Coup has started” and “Impeachment will follow” as
he rallies his followers to try to oust Donald Trump. At first, it may be written off as just a heat
of the moment reaction but six months later, in July 2017, he’s at it again
tweeting, “I predict @CNN will play a key role” and “We will get rid of him,”
which is eerily similar to FBI lead investigator into Crossfire Hurricane’s
text to his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, “We will stop him” (in response to
Page’s fear that Trump would become president).
Although it would take almost two and half years before Mark Zaid
actually carries through on this threat, carry out he does.
Mark Zaid is not alone as
Whoopie Goldberg on the view openly talks about impeachment. She eases it by saying it’s only if Trump
doesn’t do right by them. It, however,
is hard to minimize the statement when you say, “We can just kick his ass out;
there is a thing called impeachment.”
In November 2019, Donald Trump
Jr. is promoting his book Triggered
on the ultra-liberal show “The View.” He’s
with his girlfriend Kim Guilfoyle, who many remember as a frequent legal
analyst on the O’Reilly factor during its reign as the # 1 cable news program
for over a decade and half. Predictably,
the panel attacks Trump Jr. for his father’s rhetoric and he fires right back
criticizing Joy Behar for wearing blackface when she was 29. The picture was posted all over the view but
Joy writes it off as “makeup darker than my natural skin tone.”
Whoopie throws a hissy fit on
air in defense of Joy saying that since she’s black, she’s an expert on black
face and that wasn’t black face. This
isn’t the first time a member of the view will cite their credentials to
blatantly lie to their viewing audience.
Although Joy didn’t get her skin complexion as dark as Whoopie’s, the
picture undoubtedly is black face. She
even admits that her intent was to be a beautiful African woman. A better defense would be to say it was 1971;
she was 29-years-old and back then people weren’t overly sensitive to blackface
as they are now. In general, judging
past events by the current climate is highly suspect. Should we throw out Aristotle, Plato and
Socrates because back then it was standard practice for teachers to sodomize
young boys in order to establish dominance so they will listen to them? Some do argue this but this argument seems
trite and ridiculous. Current teachers,
however, should not engage in this activity.
Not to be outdone, Trump Jr.
fires back at Whoopie as she find out first hand that ‘White Man Guilt” is
diminishing and white people have no problem disagreeing with a black person
nowadays. Trump Jr. cast a stone at her
for defending rapist Roman Polanski.
Again Whoopie lies to her viewers that she didn’t defend him when she
did. She says the gloves are coming off
and they will. The most egregious
accusation, however, won’t come from Whoopie.
The news dominating the
conversation during the time of Trump Jr.’s appearance is a Whistleblower
complaint saying that President Trump engaged in a quid pro quo with new
Ukrainian president Zelensky to try to get Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and
his involvement in squelching a corruption investigation into Ukrainian energy
company Burisma, who employed Joe’s son Hunter on the board despite no relevant
experience. Mark Zaid finally got to do something to back up his texts right
after the inauguration and is representing the Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. When various media sources outed Ciaramella,
Trump Jr. tweeted an article revealing the Whistleblower’s identity. This will cause View member Sonny Hostin to
chastise Kim for not advising her boyfriend that outing a Whistleblower’s name
is a federal crime.
Oddly, Trump Jr. is the one that
responded in defense of his girlfriend pointing out that it isn’t a crime. It would only be a crime for the inspector
general, which Donald Trump Jr. is not, to do it. Rand Paul and various other people have confirmed
it but Hostin fires back, “My law degree says it is true.”
Sonny is categorically wrong as
the statue she references clearly states it’s only the Intelligence Community
Inspector General that can’t release the name.
In fact, stopping private citizens and others from doing so would be a
violation of their first amendment rights.
Her statement is just as true as her insinuation that a law degree is
capable of speaking.
Hostin would go on to directly contradict what the
Whistleblower has clearly articulated.
The Whistleblower confirmed that the transcript released by Donald Trump
is an accurate word for word transcript of their call pursuant to
procedure. Despite this, Sonny calls it
a memo because she refuses to recognize it as a transcript. They will go on to make a memo of the
transcript by removing almost 500 words from the transcript in order to make it
seem like President Trump said in the phone call that he wanted a favor from
the Ukrainian president to look into Joe Biden.
Trump starts the conversation by saying that he would like him to look
into the 2016 election and Ukraine’s involvement. They then go on to talk about how the
Ukrainian president’s staffer had spoken to Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and
would very much like to meet him.
President Trump agrees and then President Zelensky continues to reassure
President Trump that he has friends in Ukraine and Ukraine is eager to work
with him. Most of the 500 words is about
Giuliani and then President Trump brings up Joe Biden. Although it is common for liberals to take
things out of context, this is one of their more egregious examples.
Eric Swalwell has seen the view and realizes how the View
has been exposed for lying. He decides
he wants to throw them a bone and suggests passing a bill that would make it
illegal for anyone to reveal the name of a Whistleblower, not just the
Intelligence Committee Inspector General.
Swalwell doesn’t realize this but he just confirmed that Hostin did
indeed lie that it was illegal from Trump Jr. to do it. If Swalwell is successful in passing the bill
then he and his fellow Democrats can initiate retroactive indictments against
Trump Jr. for violating a law that wasn’t a law when he violated it. This practice is not new as the fifth book in
the Harry Potter series, Order of the
Phoenix had a character named ‘professor Umbridge’ who works for the
government, known as the ‘ministry of magic’ to control what kids are learning
at Hogwarts. Every time the headmaster
of the school, Dumbledore, thwarts Umbridge in a measure she would like
implementing because it violates rules, Umbridge calls the minister of magic
and gets a bill passed allowing her to do it.
She arrogantly frames and hangs the bill in the halls of the school as a
direct assault on Dumbledore.
As for the liar Hostin, people are quick to point out her
thinly veiled attempt to pass the transcript of the phone call as a memo by
cutting it and editing it. She in a
sense made a memo of the transcript in order to make it a memo.
As the deep state and Democrats are watching the View,
they don’t believe it’s going too well.
They, however, have bigger problems.
Donald Trump’s Jr.’s book is obviously biased given who the author
is. Adam Schiff is overseeing a
committee that currently has George Kent on testifying under oath about Ukraine
matters. George Kent is the former
Charge D’Affair in Ukraine, which is the second in command to the ambassador at
the United States embassy. Kent is being
called to either confirm or deny the current Charge D’affair, Bill Taylor’s,
testimony about the goings on in Ukraine.
Before going into the committee, Schiff is called by a
highly influential Democrat. The
Democrat scolds Schiff for making them look bad and reminds him that they must
defend Barack Obama’s legacy at all costs.
Schiff responds, “I’ve been doing that but things keep coming out. I tried to make this secret but that didn’t
work out so well so now we got to do it publicly and hope the behind the scenes
threats and pressure will make anyone hesitant to defend Trump in public.”
“Who’s coming today?”
“George Kent.”
“He’s not our friend”
“I’m aware, I’ll do all I can to discredit him.”
“I know you won’t let us down again.”
Schiff presumably fails in this endeavor as Kent shatters
narratives that the Democrats have been promoting for months. Kent talks about how Obama tried to partner
with Burisma on a mission named USAID. Kent
speaks about how he successfully convinced the Obama administration not to do
this because of corruption concerns that were being investigated at the
time. Ultimately, Obama’s administration
agreed it was a bad idea but this revelation exposes them that they were well
aware of Burisma and their corruption problems.
Hunter Biden, also, was not alone in his dealings with Burisma since the
US government followed him to Burisma.
It didn’t end there as Kent
spoke about the “Do Not prosecute” list given to new Ukrainian Prosecutor
General Lutsenko, who followed the general that Biden got fired after he
threatened not to allow a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine if he wasn’t. Lutsenko could easily get the message that
America is powerful enough to get him fired because they successfully got his
predecessor fired. This was a
not-so-subtle indication to Lutsenko to do what they say. In order to aid him from stepping on the toes
of America like Shokin, the previous Prosecutor General, did, they were nice
enough to give him a list of people not to go after. The thumb of America is strong on the
Ukrainian justice department. As
Lutsenko looks at this list, he notices AnTac, which is a non-profit
anti-corruption task force headed by the US government in coordination with
George Soros, a mega-liberal billionaire donor.
Kent is asked specifically about this and he remembers signing a letter
saying to leave them and other non-profits alone.
The Kent testimony sent a ripple
effect throughout the United States Government.
The same person that called Schiff before has called again to point out
how he failed him again. Schiff is not
in the mood so blurts out, “There’s too many people we need to defend. I understand Obama but why Hillary? She’s an arrogant bully who has no
power. She was humiliated by Trump and
should be delegated to the shadows where she belongs.”
“Hillary’s scandals and
corruption directly implicate President Obama.
I understand your frustration but we can’t have Obama’s name besmirched
so anyone’s scandals that overlaps and makes President Obama look bad needs to
be defended tooth and nail.”
“The party is changing. The establishments like Biden are being
phased out for more woke and progressives. People like Bernie Sanders and
Elizabeth Warren are the future of this party not Joe Biden. Let’s let the old man go to pasture.”
“Again, since he was President
Obama’s Vice President, we can’t do that.
Just remember that Barack Obama is the most liberal person ever to be
elected president and serve for two terms.
If it wasn’t for him, it would be your Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth
Warren that would be delineated to the fringes.
He paved the way for you people so never forget that.”
“I don’t forget that. I appreciate all that he’s done but we can
take it from here.”
“You fail to understand that if
President Obama goes down, he’s taking all of liberalism down with him.”
“I get what you’re saying. I’m just frustrated. There’s just so many people that keep getting
into trouble and defending them is exhausting.”
“Did you think this would be
easy? Do you think we liked that Hillary
Clinton was sending classified information on a private server. You don’t think we would rather have her just
go down and distance ourselves? That’s
why President Obama released the statement that he had no idea about her
private e-mail server.”
“Yea, only insiders know about
the White List”
“Despite how common sensical it
is, not just anybody can e-mail the president, every e-mails is pre-approved by
the White House Communication Department.
Someone had to put Hillary’s e-mail in the president’s blackberry. He obviously knew about it but thought
Hillary would win so didn’t bother stopping her. Now that she lost, it’s damage control time.”
“I hear you. I do think we’re winning though as the public
is still eating up our narratives.”
“Don’t make the same mistake
Hillary did and rest on your laurels.
Keep going.”
Elsewhere, Republican
congressmen are reacting to Kent’s testimony by looking back at testimonies
they’ve already heard. They are focused
on a transcript of former Ukrainian ambassador Yovanoitch when she testified
under oath on Capitol Hill. A staffer
goes to their boss, “You know when Marie Yovanovitch said that she never responded
to the Democrat staffer that e-mailed her about the whistleblower?”
“She said she responded to the
first text and referred them to the State Department. It was the second text she didn’t reply to.”
“It turns out that’s not true.”
“What do you mean?”
“Look here, she did
respond. She expresses that it was good
hearing from them and left the door open to a meeting face to face.”
“Show me the relevant part from
the testimony.”
The staffer, shows the transcript and highlights when
Republican congressmen Zeldin asked, Did
you receive any subsequent requests to testify to the House Foreign Affairs
Committee to come in to speak to someone following the initial e-mail? Was there any follow up?
Yovanovitch’s: Well, as I said, there
was the second e-mail where she said, ‘oh okay, you know who I should be
talking to?” I didn’t reply to the e-mail because I had already transferred
everything to the State Department and I figured that they would be in touch
and they were”.
The congressperson inquires, “Who
was the Democrat staffer?”
“Laura Carey, she’s on the
Foreign Affairs Committee.”
“Although it’s not much of a
response, it doesn’t change the fact that you just caught the former ambassador
in perjury. Now, I need to figure out
how to maximize the effect of this.
They’ll fight an indictment tooth and nail. I’m not quite sure how to handle this
information but regardless good work.”
“Thank You”
“There’s something else.”
“Oh yea?”
“Eric Ciaramella, the
Whistleblower, was Biden’s guest at the state department banquet when he was
Vice President.”
“Why does this concern you?”
“He’s a GS-13 employee. It is highly unlikely that GS-13 employees
are managers or supervisors. They’re
rarely connected to someone as high as the Vice President.”
“He’s a little more connected
than he should be you’re saying?”
“Yes, the government uses the
GS-rating. It goes up to GS-15. Above them is the SCS, which are the real big
wigs. The government pays and ranks you
based on your GS rating.”
“I’m aware how it works. I am in the government you know.”
“Forgive me; I’m not trying to
insinuate anything. It’s just that when
there are 16 levels if you include the SCS, then 13 sounds kind of high but it
really isn’t.”
“I guess the question is why is
a GS-13 employee so well connected and attending these banquets as the guest of
the second highest ranking American government employee.”
“Exactly”
With all the media talking about
Trump’s phone call with Ukraine and the View, the world has kind of forgotten
there is a Democrat primary going on to challenge Donald Trump is next year’s
election. The 2020 Presidential election
is officially less than a year away and Bernie Sanders is trying to revitalize
his campaign by tweeting out his main talking point that if they confiscate all
of Bill Gates’ 100 Billion dollars, they can pay for clean water for everyone
and a variety of other things that cost more than Bill Gates is worth. An economic adviser calls Sanders campaign
and declares, “You do realize that Gates is only rich because he did stuff with
money when he got it by bettering and expanding the company. He gave higher wages to his employees and
allowed his entry level investors to become millionaires.”
“It is Senator Sander’s position
that nobody needs that much money.”
“it’s not about need. They amassed it by helping people and
creating products that people want. The
money is just a way to keep score on how well your idea worked. Microsoft worked really really well. If you punish him for it then why would someone
make a product to help people if the government is just going to steal all
their money when they do?”
“This is an archaic
argument. Government forcing the
redistribution of wealth raises the incomes of those less fortunate. The rich
still get to be rich.”
“Not according to the Census
Bureau. In eight years, the median
income of the middle class rose $1,200. That’s after it hit a low because of
the great recession. There was only one
way to go after the housing bubble burst and financial institutions went out of
business. That was up, yet we didn’t see
a rapid growth from the bottom. We’re
still trying to get back to 2007 numbers.”
“All I heard is the median
incomes rose under Obama.”
“But they rose by $ 5,300 in
Trump’s first three years. That’s four
times more than Obama in half the amount of time and it was after Obama got off
the mat so it should have been harder.”
“Obama’s economy was just that
good and gasoline ignited it. Unfortunately, the ignition happened after Trump
became president.”
“Trump reversed almost all of
Obama’s economic policies. If Obama was
on a trend, Trump would have thwarted it.
Instead it unleashed the economy to grow at four times the rate.”
“Stop watching Fox News.”
“This is the Census Bureau, the
gold standard in economic data; this isn’t Fox News”
“We cannot allow greedy CEO’s
from making too much money. They can’t be trusted.”
“Are you saying the government
is incapable of being greedy?”
“Yes, because we don’t need the
money. We already steal It from every
citizen and we have the right to confiscate it if they don’t abide by our
taxes.”
“That just means you don’t have
to create things that people want to make money. A CEO can’t.
It’s easier to be greedy when you can confiscate wealth than it is when
you have to convince people to voluntarily give it.”
“That’s why we don’t need
salesman”
“No, your salesman convince
people that it’s good that you steal from them.”
“I have heard your concern and
we’ll take it under advisement.”
“I seriously doubt that but
you’re proving my point. Government is
unwilling to work with people. Bill Gates
has been a major donor to the Democrat party and you want to single him out to
take all his money. Be careful how
strong your rhetoric is as you may alienate these people.”
“If they go to the other side, we’ll harass them and end them as greedy pigs. They have no choice but to do as we say because we got the media on our side and the media controls the mob and mob rule always brings down corporations.”
“If they go to the other side, we’ll harass them and end them as greedy pigs. They have no choice but to do as we say because we got the media on our side and the media controls the mob and mob rule always brings down corporations.”
The economist ends the phone
calls terrified at what he just heard.
The Democrat party is being filled with unreasonable people and he
feared what would happen if they got in power.
He was about to get an indication.
The Democrats in charge of New
York, such as governor Cuomo and Senator Schumer are contemplating what to do
about Donald Trump. They contacted the
Southern District Court to try to force President Trump to release his tax
returns but Trump avoided this by renouncing his New York residency and
registering in Florida. Donald Trump,
the lifelong New Yorkers, was now a Floridian.
They call a judge and discuss what they can do in response. The judge announces, “Well, in 2016, he held
a fund raiser for Veterans.”
“Okay, where did the money go?”
Schumer asked
“It went to a variety of Veteran
charities”
“So how does that help us?”
Cuomo inquires
“Well, members of his campaign
worked on the fund in administrative roles.
We can argue that the good publicity from the fund-raising helped his
campaign.”
“Ah, so it’s a campaign
contribution” Schumer exclaimed
Cuomo added, “Even though no
money actually went to the campaign.”
“It doesn’t matter. Anything that helps him can be construed as a
campaign contribution and good publicity from a charity event and fund raising
campaign that gives Veterans $2.8 Million dollars does make a candidate look
good. I’d have to agree to it.” The
judge responds
Cuomo and Schumer get people to
file formally and the judge keeps his word and fines President Trump two
million dollars for helping Veteran charities.
As President Trump is informed
of this, he is irate. He yells, “Talk
about no good deed goes unpunished.”
One of his aids frowns, “Sir,
are you sure it’s a good idea to keep calling media people in here and trying to
negotiate with them”
“I can make deals with anyone no
matter how unscrupulous”
“I think I have two million
reasons why that is not true.”
President Trump seethes. Just when he thought the liberals and
Democrats couldn’t get any worse or more depraved, they pull something like
this. It appears there really is no
floor to their decadence.
-
No comments:
Post a Comment